Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This thesis analyzes the reasoning behind judgments issued by first-level judges in Ecuador, specifically in the context of the writ of protection. The research delves into the importance of adequate, sufficient, and correct reasoning in judicial decisions, considering its impact on the right to due process and access to justice. Furthermore, it evaluates how deficiencies in reasoning can affect the legitimacy of a judgment and violate fundamental rights. Through the analysis of cases and jurisprudence, it addresses the criteria and standards that judges must follow to ensure that their decisions are clear, reasoned, and in accordance with the law. The research also includes recommendations for improving judicial training, transparency in public procurement processes, and access to the writ of protection. The study demonstrates that adequate reasoning is key to ensuring justice, equity, and the effective protection of fundamental rights in Ecuador.