Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This research analyzes the judicial reasoning behind the judgment issued in Case No. 09969-2022-00918, a divorce proceeding based on the grounds of unjustified abandonment, with the objective of evaluating its compliance with the constitutional standards of sufficient and proper reasoning. The study was conducted using a qualitative approach, with a descriptive and analytical design, employing documentary techniques based on a review of constitutional and legal regulations, specialized doctrine, jurisprudence, and the judicial decision under analysis. The results show that the judgment generally meets the minimum requirements for reasoned decision-making established by the Ecuadorian legal system, by presenting the relevant facts, identifying the applicable regulations, and establishing a logical relationship between these elements. However, from an academic perspective, areas for improvement were identified, primarily in the evaluation of evidence and the depth of legal reasoning, although these do not constitute serious flaws that affect the validity of the ruling. The research is of particular importance to the academic and judicial institution, as it promotes the critical analysis of jurisdictional decisions and strengthens the training of legal professionals committed to the quality, transparency and legitimacy of the judicial function.