Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This research analyzes the constitutional guarantee of reasoned judgments in first-level rulings in Ecuador, evaluating their compliance with the standards of sufficiency and correctness. Using a qualitative case study methodology, Judgment No. 09286-2021-00712, concerning a murder case that generated significant public outcry, is examined in depth. Applying the criteria developed by the Constitutional Court (Judgment 1158-17-EP/21) and analytical questionnaires, it is determined that the ruling meets the requirement of sufficient reasoning, as it does not present defects of non-existence, insufficiency, or apparent lack thereof. Furthermore, it is concluded that the judgment possesses correct reasoning, highlighting the appropriate assessment of circumstantial evidence to infer the defendant's intent, the central element of the controversy. This work provides a practical tool for the critical analysis of judicial decisions, fundamental in the training of lawyers.