Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: The reasoning behind first-level judicial decisions is a solid and necessary mechanism that must be analyzed, studied, and above all, replicated in the best possible way because it is consolidated as the optimal means by which the parties resort to legal assistance and is responsible for resolving the issues of those involved in a dispute in a clear, forceful, coherent, and sufficient manner, and under the parameters of legality, taking into account the legal norms and principles recognized within the territory. Thus, the reasoning behind judgments is the opportunity and intervention of the state as a guarantor of rights to establish itself through judges as an impartial entity vested with power that seeks to prioritize the right of the parties to know the reasons and grounds that support the resolution issued by the authority. In this sense, the reasoning behind judgments becomes a very important instrument in the field of procedural law because the action and resolution of legal conflicts depend on it; therefore, it must be developed in accordance with The constitutional norm, in order to safeguard the interests of the parties, under this premise, in the analysis of Judgment No. 09333-2024-01144, the clarity of the argument presented and sufficient motivation within a judgment can be observed.