Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract:This thesis addresses the motivation behind judgments issued by first-level judges in Ecuador, highlighting its fundamental role in guaranteeing due process and the right to a defense. Through doctrinal and jurisprudential analysis, it examines the standards that determine the sufficiency and correctness of judicial reasoning, establishing key criteria to prevent arbitrary decisions and guarantee effective judicial protection. The methodology used combines theoretical review and the application of specialized questionnaires, allowing for the evaluation of the argumentative quality of the analyzed judgments. Relevant cases illustrating the application of these principles are included, as well as a discussion on the influence of constitutional jurisprudence on the consolidation of standards of reasoning in the country. This study contributes to strengthening legal certainty and improving judicial practice, emphasizing the importance of judgments that are properly reasoned and understandable to the parties involved.