Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract:.This research analyzes the motivation behind judgments issued by first-level judges in Ecuador, focusing on the constitutional duty and guarantee to provide reasons for judicial decisions. It establishes the requirement of normative and factual justification, essential elements for guaranteeing effective judicial protection, due process, and the right to defense. This approach seeks to prevent arbitrary decisions and distinguishes between correct and sufficient motivation, as well as the legal consequences of their absence or deficiency in rulings. Based on this theoretical framework, sufficiency standards and questionnaires on correct motivation are applied to a judgment concerning human trafficking for the purpose of child labor exploitation. The study identifies how judges articulate the relationship between the proven facts, applicable laws, and their final decision. This study highlights the importance of clear, sufficient, and rational motivation for the effective protection of fundamental rights, the consolidation of legal certainty, and the strengthening of public trust in the administration of justice.