Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This research analyzes the reasoning behind judgments issued by first-level judges in Ecuador, based on the judgment issued in case No. 18803-2021-00414 by the Administrative and Tax Court of Ambato, Tungurahua Province. The objective is to determine whether this decision complies with the constitutional and jurisprudential standards of reasoning, understood as clear, sufficient, and coherent argumentation, essential to guaranteeing due process. The research is based on a theoretical approach, addressing reasoning as a guarantee linked to legal certainty and effective judicial protection. Its doctrinal evolution is presented, up to its recognition as a constitutional right, along with the criteria developed by the Constitutional Court. Methodologically, the study adopts a qualitative approach based on a documentary review of relevant norms, doctrine, and jurisprudence. Finally, it is concluded that motivation constitutes an essential element of the validity of judicial decisions, the non-compliance of which can lead to nullity and affect confidence in the administration of justice.