Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This paper analyzes judicial reasoning as an essential element of due process and the legitimacy of jurisdictional decisions in Ecuador. Through a detailed examination of a judgment, the coherence between the factual, legal, and normative grounds is evaluated, identifying possible argumentative deficiencies that affect the validity of the ruling. A qualitative and analytical-descriptive methodology was applied, based on a review of doctrine, regulations, and jurisprudence, which allowed for the determination of a lack of reasoning that violates the right to effective judicial protection. The study demonstrates the importance of clear, logical, and consistent reasoning to guarantee the transparency and credibility of judicial decisions. Furthermore, it provides analytical criteria that can be used by legal professionals, professors, and students to strengthen legal practice and promote a more rational, fair, and accessible administration of justice.