Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This research analyzes the reasoning behind judgments issued by first-instance judges in Ecuador, recognizing it as a fundamental aspect of due process and a guarantee of transparency within the judicial system. This study employs a doctrinal, normative, and jurisprudential approach to evaluate whether the decisions issued by first-instance judges comply with the various guidelines established by the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. Through this analysis of several judgments, recurring deficiencies in legal argumentation are identified, such as insufficient evaluation of evidence and a lack of legal justification. These shortcomings undermine citizens' trust in the administration of justice. The results of this research allow us to propose criteria aimed at strengthening the quality of the reasoning behind judgments, with the intention of producing more reasoned, impartial, and legally sound decisions, thus contributing to a fairer and more committed judicial system.