Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This research examines how motivation is expressed in judgments issued by first-level judges in Ecuador, with the purpose of determining their argumentative quality and their impact on the protection of due process. To this end, a qualitative methodology based on the content analysis of judicial decisions in different branches of law was adopted. The study focused on the structural, logical, and legal elements of the motivation, evaluating its coherence, normative foundation, and clarity. The findings reflect that insufficient motivation compromises the right to effective judicial protection and weakens the perception of impartiality of the judicial system. Conversely, robust justification strengthens institutional credibility and respect for procedural guarantees. This work proposes recommendations for improving judicial writing, fostering argumentative practices aligned with constitutional principles and international human rights law.