Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This work presents a legal and argumentative analysis of a judgment concerning the violation of fundamental rights in the workplace and social environment. From a highly specific analytical and qualitative approach, it seeks to identify the logic that exists between the facts, the law, and the judicial response regarding how the case will be resolved, highlighting the correct application of the principles of reasoned decision-making, legal certainty, decent work, a dignified life, and priority attention. The study identifies the logical structure of the judicial reasoning, interpreting the relationship between the legal and factual grounds, demonstrating how the decision guarantees the supremacy of the Constitution and effective judicial protection. Furthermore, it reflects on the constitutional judge's role as guarantor of rights, the importance of establishing a reasoned and contractual argument, and the impact that judicial decisions with a constitutive character on the protection of vulnerable groups have on judicial spending. The research aims to contribute to the development of legal knowledge and the improvement of justice.