Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This research stems from a judicial notification regarding criminal proceedings for the offense of "Falsification and Use of a False Document" (Art. 328 of the COIP), which took place in the city of Riobamba. The primary objective is to evaluate the adequacy and correctness of the reasoning provided in judgments issued under the abbreviated procedure by trial-level judges in Ecuador. The study employs a qualitative and descriptive approach, utilizing doctrinal legal analysis, analytical-synthetic and comparative methods, and techniques for reviewing case law and current regulations. The main finding is that the legal reasoning applied by the judge was direct, logical, and consistent with the proven facts, thereby validating the legality of the ruling as it contained no grounds for nullity. However, a limitation was identified regarding the lack of depth in the individualized assessment of forensic evidence. It is concluded that adherence to appropriate standards of judicial reasoning strengthens institutional legal certainty and optimizes the efficiency of criminal procedural resources.