Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: The study titled "Reasoning in Judgments Issued by First-Instance Judges in Ecuador" aims to analyze and evaluate the correctness and sufficiency of the reasoning provided in judicial decisions issued by first-instance judges in Ecuador. The research was conducted in Ecuador, and the sample consisted of judgments selected by students who applied a detailed analysis approach. An analytical method was employed to break down the judgments into their constituent parts for an examination of the judicial reasoning. Techniques such as argumentative mapping, questionnaires assessing sufficiency and correctness of reasoning, and critical evaluation of evidence were used. The results showed that the majority of judgments met the requirements for sufficient reasoning. However, specific deficiencies were observed in some cases deficiencies that could be addressed through the appeals process. A notable finding is that these flaws do not affect the body of judgments uniformly but rather are concentrated in specific areas. In conclusion, the research highlighted the importance of adequate reasoning as a guarantee of transparency and legitimacy within the judicial process.