Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: The study aimed to analyze and evaluate the correctness and sufficiency of the reasoning provided in a judgment issued by a trial-level judge in Ecuador. The judgment in question Case No. 0931920210XXXX concerned a paternity challenge heard by the Civil Multicompetent Judicial Unit in the Naranjal Canton under ordinary proceedings. Through specific objectives, the study outlined the arguments presented in the selected judgment, analyzed the reasoning provided, and evaluated whether that reasoning was both sufficient and correct. The study employs an analytical methodology, utilizing techniques to outline judicial arguments and applying a questionnaire based on standards for sufficiency and correct reasoning. This judgment is significant for the study of law as it demonstrates effective adherence to constitutional principles regarding due process and adequate reasoning, evidenced by the correct application of legal norms and the development of the factual background.