Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This study analyzes the reasoning behind a criminal judgment concerning the offense of illicit trafficking of controlled substances, aiming to determine whether the judicial decision meets the standards of sufficient, correct, and coherent reasoning required by due process. The research was conducted within the Ecuadorian criminal justice system by examining a judgment issued by a Criminal Guarantees Tribunal in the Cuenca canton. The sample consisted of a single criminal judgment involving an individual identified as "NN," who was detained during a police operation where controlled substances were discovered. A qualitative approach was employed, utilizing the analytical method and the technique of documentary analysis of court judgments. The analysis of the judicial reasoning allowed for the breakdown of the judgment into its fundamental components to evaluate the arguments presented particularly regarding the assessment of evidence, the application of legal norms, and the justification for the Tribunal's decision. The study concludes that the judgment upholds the presumption of innocence, as insufficient evidence was presented to prove an intent to traffic; consequently, a duly substantiated acquittal was issued.