Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This research examines the reasoning behind the rulings of top-level judges, highlighting its importance as a guarantee of due process and a safeguard for the rights of the parties involved. After conducting a detailed and exhaustive analysis of existing jurisprudence, as well as relevant regulations and legislation, several recurring deficiencies in the justification of judicial decisions are identified. These include not only insufficient reasoning, but also a complete lack thereof, or in some cases, reasoning that simply appears superficial or illusory. A detailed analysis is conducted on the repercussions that inadequate reasoning can have on the legitimacy of the judicial system, as well as on the public's trust in it. The methodology implemented in this study comprises the careful selection and detailed analysis of a specific ruling. Furthermore, questionnaires are used to assess both the sufficiency and relevance of the reasoning, with the aim of carrying out a comprehensive analysis of the grounds supporting the ruling. This study provides a detailed and comprehensive analysis of the significant importance of judicial motivation, as well as its impact on the proper functioning of the justice system as a whole.