La sentencia provisional en juicio de alimentos, en materia de interdicción y de inhabilitación como excepción de cosa juzgada; en los juzgados de la familia, mujer, niñez y adolescencia del cantón Manta en el año 2012

Abstract

Abstract: In this thesis the need to incorporate in the replacement legislation declared interdicted person, who must grant right food is investigated. I analyze the main laws which he is entitled and which define this benefit; interviewing judges in order to obtain information from cases brought in the competent courts in this matter, and found that some little doubt about how to act on these judgments, since the normal process is that interdiction or disqualification is declared by judges of what civil, I this being a different food trial, and do not exist in the children's courts judgments food with this peculiarity that the injunction should provide food, specifically disabling this entails But who should replace this right, since the same rules do not provide. I recommend that a reformatory is made to Art. 349 of the Civil Code and Art. 4 of Chapter V, the ANC, who are determined where people should acquire this obligation.