Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la Carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: The present work focuses on the analysis of the sentence No. 101-15-IN/20, related to the Regulation of the New Case Management Units and Specialized Prosecutor's Offices in article 16, also on the alleged unconstitutionality of article 76 numeral 3 of theConstitution of the Republic. 101-15-IN/20, related to the Regulation of the New Case Management Units and Specialized Prosecutors in Article 16, also on the alleged unconstitutionality of Article 76 paragraph 3 of the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador and the link it keeps with one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) which seek to 2030 globally generate the elimination of poverty, promote education, equality for women, protect the planet by combating climate change and environmental protection, building a better world. The selected judgment is linked to SDG 16, Peace, Justice and Sound Institutions, which aims to promote just, peaceful and inclusive societies and by not providing this type of services, legal certainty would be violated. In this judgment, the background, legal arguments, legal standards invoked by the judges and decision were analyzed to demonstrate whether there is unconstitutionality in the rule and whether the right to due process is affected.