Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: In the study of this homicide case several fundamental rights were contravened, causing the increase of the penalty, this is legally justified in the COIP. The homicide felony was analyzed, and the technical elements of the project were investigated with the comprehensive reading of each one of the judgements founded, using a deductive/inductive method during the project development. The Judges of the first instance did a superficial interpretation of the applicable regulations, and this overruled The Constitution, and international conventions and treaties. Therefore, only the aggravating circumstances were considered ending in a 34 years and 6 months incarceration conviction, a tremendously disproportionate punishment. At the appealing in the State Court, the judgement in the first instance was ratified and the case was going to be revised at the National Court. The appeal was accepted by the judicial body, they already were aware of the state of vulnerability of the defendant and a new judgment end up in a 14 years and 6 months incarceration conviction.