Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: The present investigative work, to obtain the title of Lawyer called Academic preferences of Law students and their connection with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) through the study of sentences , is formed as an impulse to students who seek to perfect themselves in the field of Law, so that in the future they can practice such a noble profession properly. The analysis in this case of sentence No. 327 issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, issued a sentence by which I declared the Ecuadorian State internationally responsible for the violation of the obligation to guarantee the right to life of Luis Jorge Valencia Hinojosa and the violation of the right to personal integrity to the detriment of Patricia Trujillo Esparza, wife of Luis Valencia. All this is accompanied by SDG no. 16 and seeks to make known the way in which justice is administered in Ecuador and how it acts in response to the problems in which the essential human rights of people are violated, where the IACHR repaired the violated rights of the widow, stating that the sentence of the Police Criminal Court that tried the case was impartial, dependent on the state and lacked autonomy, therefore, it did not defend the right to life or personal integrity of the victims. In conclusion, the IACHR resolution was reliably based on the legal principles of reasonableness, logic and understandability, correctly adhering to the mandates of articles 75 and 76 of the Magna Carta, to articles 5, 8 and 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights and objective 14 of the Plan Creating Opportunities to comprehensively repair the violated rights of the victim of the process.