Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la Carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: This research work is part of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) number 15 Life of terrestrial ecosystems and analyzes ruling No. 2167-21-EP/22 of the Court Constitutional. This sentence arose as a result of an extraordinary protection action filed against the labor court of the Provincial Court of Justice of Pichincha. The demand alleged that the right to motivation was violated in a protection action filed against the Municipality of Quito and some of its institutional organizations. Furthermore, it argued that the rights to live in a healthy and ecological environment were violated balanced, in connection with the right to safe habitat, water, sustainable development and the city. These rights also include the rights of nature and heritage. cultural. The plenary session of the Constitutional Court confirmed the violation of the right to motivation and others rights that were in doubt in the analysis of this ruling. This is related to the plaintiffs, who are inhabitants of the area and have the Monjas River as a subject of rights constitutional.