Eficacia de las Medidas Cautelares Alternativas a la Prisión Preventiva Para Asegurar la Comparecencia del Procesado en la Audiencia de Juicio

Abstract

Abstract: The present degree work focuses on evaluating the effectiveness of precautionary alternatives to preventive detention to guarantee the comparability of the processing at the trial hearing. The methodology includes a comparative analysis of legal systems that have implemented these measures, considering factors such as legislation, resources and the judicial field. Types of measures such as house arrest, electronic surveillance device and the obligation to report periodically to the authority are examined. The results reveal that alternative measures can be effective if they are implemented properly and resources are available for their supervision. Challenges are identified such as the lack of logistical resources. The main conclusion is that alternative precautionary measures have the potential to ensure the comparison of the accused at the trial hearing, but require specific conditions for their success, highlighting the importance of adopting good practices and guaranteeing adequate resources.