Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la Carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencia

Abstract

Abstract: The curricular integration work examines an extraordinary protection action presented by a public servant removed without administrative procedure, linking the case with the right to due process. Although it mentions the violation of the right to work, it does not present specific arguments. Regarding discrimination, the plaintiff claims that his dismissal was due to acts of homosexuality. Although it does not explicitly allege the violation of the right to equality and non-discrimination, the Constitutional Court decides to analyze it, highlighting the importance of self-identification. Although the facts precede the 2008 Constitution, it is highlighted that the rights claimed were recognized in the 1979 Constitution. The theoretical framework emphasizes that the right to due process encompasses administrative decisions, with emphasis on clear rules to avoid discretion and discriminatory practices. In the workplace, the importance of protecting against discrimination based on sexual orientation is highlighted, concluding that the plaintiff's separation violated the principle of non-discrimination at work. Regulations such as article 103 of the Military Discipline Regulations cannot justify discriminatory treatment.