La violación del debido proceso en la aplicación del procedimiento abreviado, por falta de motivación y valoración de la prueba en la sentencia por parte de los jueces de garantías penales en Pichincha

Abstract

Abstract: This thesis will analyze the importance of a correct assessment of the evidence for the charge and defense presented by the procedural parties to the judge of criminal guarantees within the public and contradictory oral hearing of Abbreviated Procedure. Currently the Abridged Procedure is established in the new Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code in its Art. 635 as a special procedure. One of the requirements for the application of the abbreviated procedure is the acceptance of the defendant of the factual fact that is imputed to him, a requirement that cannot be the only basis of the sentence of the judge of criminal guarantees to determine the guilt of the defendant, in addition the defendant must freely and voluntarily accept to submit to this process and must be informed of the legal consequences of submitting to it by their defense attorney, with this, due process within this procedure is fulfilled.