Estudio de las sentencias sobre la acción extraordinaria de protección en el Ecuador.

Abstract

Abstract: This study on the extraordinary protection action contributes to the normative legal, and doctrinal analysis of the exercise of the powers granted to the Constitutional Court, as a mechanism for the protection of rights, when they are violated by action or omission of the judges in the decisions that It corresponds to them to adopt, in the causes brought to their knowledge. The methodology used proposes an analytical investigation of the jurisprudence created in our country in constitutional matters, jurisprudence issued by the Constitutional Court through the different resolutions of the extraordinary protection action, issued in 2016, developing the sheets proposed in the project Puzzle. The research mechanisms used are: the analytical / synthetic method and Legal constructivism, the techniques used: charting, case study, direct observation and bibliographic review. The present investigation obtained as a result that the vast majority of these actions are rejected since it is intended to use the constitutional route to claim rights that have an ordinary procedure and that they must be claimed in that way. It was concluded that for an extraordinary protection action to proceed, it is necessary that its foundation be the violation of a right contemplated in the constitution or in an instrument of international law that protects the violated right.