Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la Carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencia

Abstract

Abstract: Ruling No. 1342-16-EP/21, issued by the Constitutional Court and analyzed in the present research, is linked to the violation of legal security, due process, and, above all, the constitutional rights of a person with special abilities who served as a judicial assistant in the Traffic Judicial Unit in the city of Ambato. This individual was subjected to acts of discrimination, culminating in the premature termination of their provisional appointment. The ruling addresses the case of Mr. Renato David Romero Villacís, who performed his duties as a judicial assistant. The ruling clearly reveals the violation of Mr. Romero Villacís' right to reinforced job stability and material equality. Similarly, this research delves deeply into the Court's decision, which ensures the faithful observance of Mr. Romero Villacís' human rights, and highlights that the ruling itself serves as a measure of satisfaction for the victim. The ruling concludes that it is essential to strengthen public policies and existing regulations to ensure the respect of the constitutional rights of individuals with special abilities. These actions would guarantee social justice and contribute to achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 8, promoting sustainable and inclusive development.