Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: Linking Constitutional Court ruling 456-20-JP/21, which analyzes restorative justice and the right to due process in the educational field in a case of "sexting," with Sustainable Development Goal 16 of the 2030 Agenda, presented by the United Nations, which speaks of peace, justice, and strong institutions, leads us, above all, to analyze legal security, effective judicial protection, the rights of participation, communication, and information, as well as the right to good public administration, as rights protected in this goal. It also allows us to demonstrate how constitutional judges neglect this case of a crime committed by minors, with a data protection law in place, to raise the concept of restorative justice in a crime classified by our Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code, disregarding a violation of privacy that is never analyzed. It is undeniable that this ruling, instead of contributing to any progress, weakens the legal security of the educational institution and the rights of the affected girl, and condones a crime with empty and biased arguments.