Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: This section focuses on the academic preferences of Law students and their connection to the Sustainable Development Goals through the study of court rulings. This detailed analysis seeks to understand the academic preferences of students. Therefore, the subject of Criminal Law and the ruling of July 29, 2020, No. 2170-18-EP/20, issued by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador based in the canton of Quito, D.M., were selected. Related to the case: the disputed issue focuses on the acceptance and rejection of the appeals for cassation, as well as the imposition of custodial sentences on the defendants. Additionally, it is mentioned that some defendants are filing extraordinary protective actions against the rulings issued, which adds an additional layer of controversy to the case. This ruling was linked to SDG 16. It was complemented by legal documents and various descriptive research methods related to science. The result was a declaration of a violation of the constitutional rights of Danny Alexis Herrera Mamarandi, Magno Michilena Michilena, Carlos Vinicio Altamirano Gavilanes, Fausto Alejandro Tamayo Cevallos, and Daniel Patricio Gutiérrez Romero to due process, guaranteeing a trial with due process and grounds.