Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: This jurisprudential analysis analyzes Sentence No. 140-15-SEP-CC of an extraordinary protection action presented by Dr. Jorge Andrade Avecillas as legal representative of Banco Machala S.A. against the ruling of the Labor Chamber of the National Court of Justice. Thus, the Constitutional Court determined the violation of the constitutional rights enshrined in articles 76 numeral 7 literal I, 82, 11 numeral 2 and 66 numeral 4 of the Constitution of the Republic. The sentence was handed down within the framework of a review of a sentence issued by the National Court of Justice that violates the right to equality of the plaintiff, by not justifiably substantiating the reasons why a different criterion is applied than in other specific cases that They keep the same factual pattern. In such a way, it is related to Sustainable Development Goal No. 16 Peace, Justice and Solid Institutions given that the ruling highlights the importance of guaranteeing legal security, equality before the law and access to justice through motivated decisions.