Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This research paper analyzes the ruling on a Protection Action filed by the Legal Representative of the Feminist Action for Peace organization against Jorge Arturo Bailón Abad, and Attorney Nixon Arlig Granda, councilors of the canton of Loja. The dispute over the appointment of the Vice Mayor of Loja violated the Principle of gender parity and equity enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. The ruling highlights the failure of the Decentralized Autonomous Government to comply with standards on equality and non-discrimination. The evaluation focuses on whether the judicial decision complied with the requirements for providing justification in Ruling No. 1158-17-EP/21 of the Constitutional Court. The ruling's justification is analyzed by comparing it with the standards of the Constitutional Court, including adequate factual and legal grounds. The research considers the democratic impact of judicial omissions on the equal participation of women and men, analyzing how these decisions affect or not the.