Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de derecho y su vinculación con los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencia

Abstract

Abstract: This jurisprudential analysis examines the judgment of November 27, 2018 (Trueba Arciniega et al. v. Mexico) of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. The case relates to the international responsibility of the Mexican State in relation to the extrajudicial execution of the young man Mirey Trueba Arciniega by members of the Army in the State of Chihuahua. It indicates that the events occurred while the Armed Forces were carrying out public security tasks. Mirey Trueba suffered extreme physical suffering; security agents failed to provide an immediate response despite the seriousness of the situation without seeking medical help as soon as possible. In this way, the State violated the right to judicial protection due to the use of military criminal justice, and there was a lack of negligence in the conduct of the investigations. The ruling under study is related to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) No. 5 "Gender Equality", of the so-called 2030 Agenda, given that it protects the rights to gender equality, physical, sexual and psychological personal integrity, and non-discrimination.