Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la Carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencia

Abstract

Abstract: This jurisprudential analysis examines Judgment No. 169-13-SEP-CC, in a report by constitutional judges Pamela Martínez Loayza, Roxana Silva Chicaíza and Francisco Butiñá Martínez, of an extraordinary action for protection filed by Mr. Eduardo Enrique Ruiz Cruz and Mrs. Maryuri Alexandra Luz de Fátima Ramírez Mendoza, against the orders issued by the First Civil and Commercial Judge of Guayas that arose in the city of Guayaquil as a result of an executive process initiated by the judicial attorney Mr. Cristóbal Xavier Terán Alvear of Banco General Rumiñahui S.A., the plaintiffs allege the violation of the rights to effective judicial protection and due process in the guarantee of motivation, enshrined in articles 75 and 76 numeral 7, literal l) of the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador (CRE). The contested court decisions, notifications, and documents submitted by the parties to the proceedings were used as samples. As a result, it was concluded that the contested ruling contains premises that are inconsistent with its nature, which violates the requirement of logic.