Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la Carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencia

Abstract

Abstract:This research is carried out with the purpose of analyzing Judgment No. 380-17-SEP-CC, of case No. 2334-16-EP, of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador, where a judgment of the Provincial Court of Azuay is considered that, in the opinion of the Plenary of the Constitutional Court, the right to health of a child was violated, as well as the analysis of unconstitutionality of article 102 of the Social Security Law, in which it determined that the rights of different types of families are violated, which has affected access to specialized health care, especially for children who have been given into the custody of relatives who are members of Social Security. This ruling is linked to Sustainable Development Goal 3: health and well-being, which is one of the human rights, which is protected under different international instruments that Ecuador has signed, therefore, the Constitutional Court declared in a ruling the violation of the Right to health of a child who presented a condition of double vulnerability.