Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencia

Abstract

Abstract:The presented document reviews the extraordinary protection action filed by an individual against a judicial decision that denied precautionary measures for the provision of Efavirenz, a crucial antiretroviral medication for HIV treatment. The applicant argues that this decision infringes upon fundamental rights, including due process and effective judicial protection, as it fails to acknowledge the urgency of their situation. The critique highlights the judge's misinterpretation of precautionary measures, which should serve to prevent rights violations rather than merely remedy them. Furthermore, the ruling disregards the urgent need for timely access to medication for individuals in vulnerable situations. This case is closely linked to SDG 3, which aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all. Denying precautionary measures undermines the applicant s health and their right to timely healthcare, a lifeline for people living with HIV. The analysis emphasizes the necessity of protecting constitutional rights in critical circumstances, reinforcing the global commitment to equitable healthcare access.