Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la Carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencia

Abstract

Abstract: This thesis analyzes the case of Gonzales Lluy et al. vs. Ecuador (Judgment No. 298, September 1, 2015), filed before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which addresses the responsibility of the Ecuadorian State for human rights violations due to the lack of oversight in health services. In this case, Talía Gonzales, at the age of three, contracted HIV after receiving a contaminated blood transfusion in a private hospital. The Court concluded that the State violated the rights to health, personal integrity, education, and access to justice, and ordered various reparation measures, including lifelong medical treatment and free education for the victim. The judgment is directly linked to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being, which seeks to guarantee access to safe, quality, and adequate health services for all. The study is organized into four main chapters: a review of the literature on SDG 3 and the rights it protects; the applied research methodology; A fact sheet and an in-depth analysis of the link between the ruling and SDG 3; and finally, a presentation of the findings, conclusions, and proposed recommendation.