Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de derecho y su vinculación con los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible (ods) a través del estudio de sentencias.

Abstract

Abstract:The case "Herrera Espinoza et al. vs. Ecuador" marks a milestone in the protection of human rights by addressing severe violations committed by the Ecuadorian State, including arbitrary detention, torture, and lack of due process. These actions revealed Ecuador s failure to meet its international obligations under the American Convention on Human Rights, particularly regarding the rights to personal liberty, integrity, and judicial guarantees. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights' September 1, 2016, ruling highlights state accountability and orders comprehensive reparations. Key measures include financial compensation, psychological and social rehabilitation for the victims, institutional reforms, and guarantees of non-repetition. The decision underscores the need for structural changes within Ecuador s judicial system to prevent similar violations in the future. This study employs a socio-legal approach to analyze the case s impact on Ecuador's justice system and its contribution to strengthening human rights within the inter-American framework. The findings illustrate how the Court s mandated reparations can transform the social and legal environment, fostering justice and equity. The case also emphasizes the importance of aligning judicial decisions with Sustainable Development Goals, particularly SDG 16, which promotes peace, justice, and strong institutions. By doing so, it underscores the transformative potential of international mechanisms in enforcing human rights obligations and building fairer societies. The analysis concludes that "Herrera Espinoza et al." serves as a critical precedent for addressing systemic judicial failures and advancing the protection of fundamental rights at both national and international levels.