Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: The Monte Sinai Hospital case exposed a serious violation of the right to privacy and the protection of personal data, after the psychological medical record of a minor was released without authorization. This paper analyzes the ruling that resolved the habeas data action, focusing its study on the reasoning behind it and the correct application of the regulations designed to protect sensitive data in the medical field. Although the judge acknowledged the violation and acted in favor of the victim, the decision revealed gaps in the legal argumentation, especially by omitting the analysis of specialized laws such as the Organic Law on the Protection of Personal Data, the Law on Patients' Rights and Protection, and the Code for Children and Adolescents. The study concludes that a ruling can be just, but its reasoning can be improved. Strengthening the judicial culture on data protection is essential to ensure that justice not only redresses, but also prevents future violations and consolidates public trust in the judicial system.