Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This thesis is a detailed study of the reasoning behind the judgments issued by first-level judges, specifically focusing on the judgment in case No. 08201-2018-01645 concerning a claim for a declaration of the non-existence of a de facto union between the parties. The project aims to identify, analyze, and examine the reasoning behind the judgment to determine whether or not it meets the standards of sufficiency for proper reasoning. The thesis includes a literature review that examines the theoretical aspects of reasoning and the requirements for sufficient reasoning. It also includes the methodology, which explains the research methods used, such as the Jigsaw method and a comprehensive and detailed reading of the judgment to identify its strengths and weaknesses. In addition, the study of the results is considered, which is an evaluation through questionnaires on the sufficiency of the motivation and to identify whether or not the sentence lacks flaws in its motivation.