Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This thesis aims to analyze the reasoning behind judgments issued by first-level judges in Ecuador, using as a case study Judgment No. 23281-2023-01578, issued by the Criminal Judicial Unit of Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, in a case concerning the illicit trafficking of controlled substances. The central problem lies in identifying the sufficiency and correctness of the judicial reasoning, understood as a guarantee of due process and the right to defense. The research was conducted using a qualitative approach, employing the analytical method and the case study approach, while also including a review of legal doctrine, regulations, and jurisprudence. The sufficiency and correctness of the reasoning were assessed through surveys. The research results indicate that, although the analyzed ruling meets the minimum requirements for justification, it has deficiencies in terms of the clarity of its legal reasoning and the comprehensive evaluation of the evidence. Finally, recommendations and conclusions are presented aimed at optimizing judicial practice in terms of the justification of judgments.