Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador.

Abstract

Abstract: This research study analyzes the reasoning behind decisions made by trial court judges in Ecuador. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of such reasoning in guaranteeing due process and overseeing the work of the courts. Using an analytical approach, we will examine a civil court decision by breaking down each of its arguments. This will enable us to understand the legal issue at hand, the evaluation of evidence, and the logical structure of the ruling. The findings will demonstrate that judicial reasoning is not merely a formal requirement but a constitutional mandate that must meet standards of clarity, coherence, sufficiency, and, above all, reasonableness. Additionally, the study will identify deficiencies such as a lack of reasoning or an apparent absence thereof that can infringe upon fundamental rights and render a decision invalid. In conclusion, adequate and robust reasoning strengthens legal certainty while guaranteeing the right to a defense and legitimizing the judicial function within a constitutional state that values ​​rights and justice.