Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This research focuses on the study of the reasoning behind rulings issued by first-level judges in Ecuador, with the aim of evaluating their quality and their impact on the guarantee of due process. A qualitative methodology was adopted, based on a detailed analysis of judicial decisions issued in various legal areas. The review of legal foundations, argumentative coherence, and clarity of presentation allowed for the identification of both strengths and shortcomings in relation to the standards established by the Constitution and international instruments. The study concludes that insufficient reasoning compromises fundamental rights and weakens trust in the justice system, whereas well-grounded reasoning strengthens the legitimacy, transparency, and credibility of the judiciary. This work provides useful guidelines for improving judicial practice and promotes a legal culture focused on strong legal reasoning and respect for the principles of a constitutional State governed by the rule of law.