La insuficiente norma expresa del doble conforme, a lo excepcionado en la parte final del numeral 6 del art. 333 del COGEP, vulnera el debido proceso previsto en el art. 76 numeral 7 literal m, de la Constitución de la Republica, al no poder una de las partes activar su recurso de inconformidad a lo resuelto en esa única instancia

Abstract

Abstract: This work arisesfrom the observation, carried out in some processes processed for the collection of fees and in which the defendant has tried to file an appeal, more to the express refusal in the final part of numeral 6 of Art. 333 prohibits filing an appeal of appeal, which is denied by the judges, because there is an express rule, therefore the objective for the development of this work is to establish the need that exists to restore the right to appeal in this case, which has not has been foreseen by the legislator, with regard to this article, thus our Magna Carta guarantees us in its Art. 76 the right to appeal in all instances, as well as the doctrine collects with the principle of double conformed, that it is about the conformity that citizens must have before an arbitrary sentence, and equality before the Law.