Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract:The Constitutional Court of Ecuador's ruling 212-20-EP/24 accepted an extraordinary protection action and concluded that the Ministry of Government violated the rights of four unaccompanied adolescents in a situation of human mobility, including the rights to migrate, family reunification, and priority care, in addition to the principle of the best interests of the child. The analysis of the research studied emphasizes the lack of migration control and social inclusion policies in Ecuador, imperatively pointing out the implementation of public policies for children and adolescents in situations of mobility. Furthermore, the transgression of constitutional rights and guarantees is evident in aspects such as education, health, food, social security and human mobility for migrants, establishing that the authorities frequently ignore international human rights instruments, which results in systematic violations of rights. Although the Organic Law of Human Mobility has positive effects, it presents a deficit in access to programs and attention for the social and economic reintegration of emigrants. Therefore, it is suggested to encourage and promote timely actions, as well as the implementation of international cooperation systems for the protection of the rights of minors and the formulation of legal strategies that guarantee effective compliance with the principle of the best interests of the child.