Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This study analyzes the reasoning provided in judgments issued by trial-level judges in Ecuador, focusing on its role as a guarantee of due process in child support cases. The general objective was to evaluate how judges substantiate their decisions, ensuring they respect the best interests of the child and promote shared parental responsibility. The research was conducted at the Judicial Unit for Family, Women, Children, and Adolescents in the Ambato Canton, Tungurahua Province, using Judgment No. 18202-2021-XXXXX as the sample. A qualitative approach was adopted, employing descriptive and analytical methods. Techniques included document analysis and a review of case law, while instruments consisted of questionnaires designed to measure the adequacy and correctness of the judicial reasoning. The results showed that the analyzed ruling met constitutional standards, clearly and coherently setting out the facts, applicable legal norms, and logical reasoning underpinning the judicial decision. It was demonstrated that judicial reasoning ensures understanding, transparency, and democratic oversight. The general conclusion indicates that adequate reasoning strengthens the legitimacy of the judicial system and ensures the comprehensive protection of the rights of the minors involved.